Lucas Bivert Ecom Empire Academy
we did not tested this course yetA new review of Lucas Bivert Ecom Empire review is released by the Empire State Review, where the author claims that he did not write it. Bivert says that the Empire State Review owes him an apology for writing an article about him, which included the title of his Ecom Empire review and some of the information Bivert discussed. Bivert is now seeking legal counsel, but if this Empire State Review is true, then it would not be the first time that a business owner is accused of plagiarizing when the original author never even reads the work, much less has any knowledge of its contents. If you take a look at the article, you will see that the article was written by a third person – the Empire State Review – and that the information was copied verbatim from Bivert’s review. Now, in a legal sense, there is not much that can be done, because while plagiarism is a crime, it is not against the law to plagiarize, as long as the content remains unchanged. Still, this would seem to be an unfair advantage for someone else to have in writing a review of one’s own product. If you are an avid Star Wars fan, you may remember reading my review of the Empire’s Expanded Universe book Imperial Edict. I found myself reading several reviews of that book before I actually read it, and in my opinion, I thought it was a solid book, with a lot to offer to those fans. Unfortunately, several of the books that I read were written by people who had no previous experience in publishing science fiction. In fact, they were so poorly informed that their reviews were nothing more than a sales pitch for their products, without the knowledge of whether or not their review was even worth reading. In many of the reviews that were left on different book review sites, these authors seemed to be very well informed, but still had a hard time coming up with any real facts that supported their claims. In many cases, they simply recycled information from their previous reviews and did not even understand what they were writing about. It seems that this pattern has repeated itself over again and is becoming a huge problem in the publishing industry, where publishers often plagiarize other people’s work in order to have reviews posted online or in print. While there are many people who have done this, it is only recently that people have been caught doing it, thanks to the internet. Bivert has made several changes to his original review of the Ecom Empire, and the Empire State Review has since amended the article that they wrote about it. However, the original article states that Bivert does not write, although he was the one who created the website that contains the reviews. In this Empire State Review, the author claims that he has been threatened by “a few people” who claimed that he is guilty of plagiarizing, and he has had to deal with a few people who are threatening to sue him for copyright infringement. They have even sent him death threats and others who are criticizing his book. To me, this just doesn’t look right. This is another example of people using someone else’s hard work to try to sway the reader, and this writer should be held accountable for his own work. So, while there are critics of his original work, it seems like a little bit of an uphill battle to prove that he plagiarized, especially if it is the work of someone with no prior experience.
This post is also available in: Français